Brandt Schneider's article on
creating musical flexibility promotes the idea that band students should be
learning how to be well-rounded musicians. He makes the point that because of the way band and
orchestra are usually taught; students end up being limited in their musical
skills. The typical high school
band conductor is only interested in giving a piece of music to the students and
having them read it and learn how to play it. Mr. Schneider points out that there’s a lot more to music
than just playing the notes on a page.
He argues that students should be learning not only how to read, but how
to transpose, play by ear, and compose.
He focuses on four specific skills, which are musical discipline,
technique, theory, and composition.
The way he defines these skills in the article however, makes me believe
that they could almost have been simplified even further into one skill: theory. If a student is to develop into a musician that can learn
something by ear, know many different tunes by heart, transpose a piece of
music on the spot, improvise, and compose, then they have to have a strong
foundation in theory. The student
actually has to know why the notes she is playing work and the piece sounds like
it does, as well as how all of the different parts fit together.
This
is something that I certainly never learned when I was in school playing in the
orchestra or in my private cello lessons.
It’s kind of amazing how little theory “needs” to be taught when
teaching someone an orchestral instrument. I thing what Mr. Schneider is really saying in his article
is that classical musicians should learn the same skills that jazz musicians
usually learn. A jazz musician is
expected to know a bunch of standards by memory, have the ability to transpose,
improvise, and have the ability to learn music by ear. A classical musician, especially one at
the high school level is really only expected to be able read music and play
his instrument. It’s quite a
discrepancy, and I agree with Mr. Schneider that it really shouldn’t be this
way. Learning these skills would
help a high school band student have a greater understanding of music and be a
better musician.
This
isn’t to say that just reading and playing your instrument isn’t incredibly
important. I actually think that
the technical aspect of playing an instrument is the most important thing in
determining whether someone is a “good” musician. Someone could have a lot of theoretical knowledge about how
music works, but if she doesn’t have the ability to get a good sound on her
instrument, then she can’t be considered a good musician. Learning the skills that Mr. Schneider
discuses in the article certainly can make one a much better musician. In fact you can argue that to be a
great musician, one needs to be able to do all of those things. However, I think the baseline for just
being “good” is the ability to be technically proficient enough to play the
notes on the page musically.
That's a good baseline for being considered good, but what about creativity? I think that should come into play somehow when considering if a musician is good or not.
ReplyDelete